A few days ago David N kindly sent me a copy of the Baker paper, and I transcribed some of the data points here.
The Baker paper collected statistics up to 1986, and consisted of data from about 14,000 fields. Robelius with more recent data put it at 34,500 fields.
From the data, it looks like between 1986 and now that many more of the smaller fields became developed and therefore got counted in the statistics. So in the last 20 years, we probably have gained substantial mileage from the low volume reservoirs, explained by either of these possibilities:
- Smaller fields get deferred for production due to economic reasons
- Smaller fields have a smaller cross-section for discovery so therefore show up later in the historical process. This second-order effect plays a smaller role in dispersive discovery than one would intuit -- i.e. not as if all big fields get found first, instead the probability weighting has a slight bias toward bigger fields.